|
What is the National Arbitration
Forum?
Consumers are being scammed by
arbitration in unprecedented
numbers by bottom feeder debt
buyers. Most are from the
National Arbitration Forum
(NAF), out of Minneapolis, MN.
You can view their site at:
www.arb-forum.com This is
not
a non profit or
government site, it is FOR
profit
operated by
some very rich
individuals who are being paid
by those who
seek arbitration
claims. Some of the biggest
names who use and
profit by the
NAF include:
WOLPOFF & ABRAMSON, Baltimore,
MD (largest profiteer of claims)
ESKANOS & ADLER
, Concord, CA
MANN BRACKEN, Atlanta, GA
together now known as
Mann
Bracken
COLLECT AMERICA (CACH & CACV),
Denver, CO (2nd largest)
BRONSON & MIGLIACCIO, Buffalo,
NY & Elmwood Park, NJ
NCO FINANCIAL, Baltimore, MD
MOORE, GERALD & ASSOC., Atlanta,
GA
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, Midland Funding,
MRC Receivables, ENCORE Capital Group, San
Diego, CA
using
American Arbitration Association
MRS ASSOCIATES, Cherry Hill, NJ
plus many more.
Research by consumer attorneys reveals
claims submitted
to
arbitration are found to be
against the consumer over 90
percent
of
the time.
How is
this possible?
The vast majority of arbitration
claims are
filed by debt buyers
who do not have even the
requisite documentation called
for in the
NAF Code of Procedure.
Organizations such as Wolpoff,
Credigy, Gerald E. Moore and
CACH usually get the arbitration
claim ruled in their favor by
supplying ’some’ documents and
of course, paying the required
fee.
Those who play the part of an
arbitrator, usually attorneys,
or
retired judges, some looking for
extra cash, are reportedly paid
a
$250/hourly rate to handle up
six claims per hour.
When the party
paying the fee wins almost every
time, it's easy to understand
the high
90% loss rate for consumers.
The
Rule of Law.
But let's not lose sight of
what's going on here. This
is not just the
95 out of one hundred consumers
who lost whining. It's
about the
rule of law. According to
the rules of arbitration, a debt buyer who
invokes the NAF must provide
certain documents.
Original documents that are,
in most cases,
unavailable to them.
Since that is impossible,
every
arbitration ruling
against a consumer amounts to
little more
than
rubber-stamping,
and, if we can be so bold,
whoring, on the
part of the
arbitration judge.
Whoring. What else can it
be called? The arbitrator
has put the
lure of easy money - $250 an
hour - above the rule of law.
He's gotten
into the same bed as the debt
buyer.
An
honest arbitrator. As
short-lived as a teenager's
promise not to
speed.
We know of one Houston
attorney who followed the rules,
and
kicked out claims when debt collectors could not
prove
up the debts.
It was as
though he was saying to the NAF,
I don't really want your money.
We'll miss him.
Most other so-called judges pay
little attention to the details
of the
claims, ignore the NAF rules and
gloss over the manufactured documents
in favor of a quick check.
One California arbitrator,
Robert H. McMillan awarded Wolpoff & Abramson more than
$330,000 on 22 claims in just
one day making a
fine payday for both W&A and
McMillan. Never mind that
twenty two
consumers are now subject to
judgments and lost their day in
court.
Attorneys handling arbitration
claims for the National
Arbitration
Forum, (NAF) Minneapolis, MN may
find the fee being paid is not
worth the potential negative
publicity that could follow.
Because
"Binding Mandatory Arbitration"
is becoming the rule, rather
than
the exception, we have set up
this site to educate and inform
consumers.
But moreover, we will use this
arena to expose those who do not
follow the rule of law.
Justice should not be
one-sided. Heads I win...
If you
toss a coin 100 times in a row,
you would expect that an
honest flipping would result in
a Tails coming up at
least 15 or 20
times. No such luck in
arbitration.
The toss is fixed. NAF
Contract
employees who decide
arbitration claims are paid an average fee
of
$250/hour with the understanding
they handle six claims per
hour.
The forum’s largest customer
base is comprised of debt
collection agencies and law
firms who purchase defaulted
consumer debts for pennies on
the dollar, then pay a fee of
$250/per account for an
arbitration hearing that the
debtor
never gets to participate
in. The main problem raised by
consumer advocates is that the
forum is unfair in its policies,
consumers have no say in
the outcome and that the
attorneys
and judges handling
arbitration claims have found a
lucrative
income stream that
allows them to handle as many
claims as
they desire in the
comfort of heir homes or
offices. Until now,
they have
been able to stay mostly under
the radar of detection
because
their work went (for the most
part) unnoticed and their
identities and backgrounds were
mostly shielded from those
they
ruled against.
Spotlight on Arbitrators.
All of that is
about to change.
This website is ready to expose the corruption of arbitration
and ‘rubber-stamping’
of National Arbitration Forum
claims and those
seduced by the easy money. We are collecting a list of names
of those who are getting paid by
the NAF and will publish
the public information on the
rubber-stampers.
The website will
be used to call attention to
what is perceived as a one sided
system, where arbitration claims
are awarded on more than 90% of
the claims filed, with little or
no scrutiny given to the records
that are made, or not made
available to make those decisions, including the fact
that the consumers are party to
an arbitration agreement.
Attorneys who engage in
arbitration claims for the
National Arbitration Forum could
see a hostile reaction from
consumers who feel they were
victims of a one sided process
that rewards the claimants and
arbitrators for a process where
they were denied their rights.
|